4 weeks ago
23
I encourage you all to do you own research here..
but it would appear that one of the wealthiest and most politically powerful elites, career politician Nancy Pelosi, who has a net worth in the vicinity of $250mil on a salary of <$200k
Placed some REALLY shady as fuck stock trading maneuvers with UnitedHealthCare stock which strongly suggest insider trading.
And then the CEO of the company she made supposedly $11+million off of, gets whacked.
And instead of discussing HER: everyone is talking about the most OBVIOUS Patsy in decades who we are supposed to believe was literally walking around the most high traffic location, McDonalds, as the most wanted fugitive on Earth... with his pockets full of all the evidence that a prosecutor could ever dream of. Multiple fake IDs linked to this ridiculous Starbucks pre murder photo op, murder weapon and a manifesto. Yeah. Ok.
Quick note... if any of you actually believe the mainstream story of this shit, PM me about a once in a lifetime real estate deal on an Oceanfront condo in Kansas. This deal WONT LAST!! You can pay me in crypto.
Tweets below, summary copied from one of them pasted here:
BREAKING: Newly Discovered Connection Between Nancy Pelosi & Luigi Mangione Raises Questions In UnitedHealth CEO Murder Investigation
Key Points • Cyberattack Timeline: A major cyberattack on UnitedHealth Group in February 2024 coincided with Paul Pelosi's $4 million investment in Palo Alto Networks, which later investigated the breach.
• UnitedHealth CEO's Death: Brian Thompson, UnitedHealth CEO, was murdered shortly before he was set to testify in a DOJ case that could have implicated Nancy Pelosi in insider trading.
• Luigi Mangione's Role: Luigi Mangione, a tech-savvy scion of a wealthy Maryland family with historical ties to the D’Alesandro family (Nancy Pelosi), was arrested in connection with Thompson's death.
• Potential Insider Trading: Speculation suggests the cyberattack could have been orchestrated to facilitate insider trading benefiting the Pelosi family.
• Pelosi/Mangione Family Ties: Nicholas Mangione, Luigi's grandfather, had ties to Thomas D’Alesandro Jr., Nancy Pelosi’s father, raising questions about long- standing family connections.
When it comes to the intersection of power, influence, and corruption, nothing surprises us anymore. But the unfolding saga around Luigi Mangione, Nancy Pelosi, and UnitedHealth Group's cyberattack is a story that raises every eyebrow and begs serious questions.
Is there a connection between the tech-savvy scion of a wealthy Maryland family, a devastating cyberattack, and what could be one of the most intricate insider trading scandals in modern history?
Let’s break it down.
The Timeline of Intrigue
In February 2024, UnitedHealth Group, one of the largest private insurers in the United States, suffered a catastrophic cyberattack.
On the exact same day, Paul Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi's husband, made a curious financial move: purchasing $4 million in call options for Palo Alto Networks, a leading cybersecurity firm.
Shortly after, Palo Alto Networks was chosen to investigate the breach. Coincidence? Perhaps. But the timing is eyebrow-raising, to say the least.
As the fallout unfolded, UnitedHealth Group was left grappling with a $2.3 billion response bill, a tarnished reputation, and data breaches impacting one-third of Americans.
Among those reportedly affected by the cyberattack was Brian Thompson, UnitedHealth’s CEO, who was scheduled to testify before the Department of Justice regarding potential insider trading allegations that could have implicated Pelosi.
Enter Luigi Mangione
Luigi Mangione, a computer science graduate from the University of Pennsylvania and the grandson of Nicholas Mangione—a man with well-documented ties to Pelosi’s father, Thomas D’Alesandro Jr.—is no stranger to controversy.
While Luigi has largely remained in the shadow of his family’s business empire, his technical expertise and access to wealth raise questions about his potential role in this high-stakes drama.
Luigi was arrested in December 2024 in connection with the murder of Brian Thompson, just weeks before the CEO was set to testify.
While authorities have focused on the immediate crime, the broader context suggests a potential motive linked to protecting powerful individuals.
Could Luigi Mangione have been part of a coordinated effort to silence Thompson and shield Pelosi from insider trading accusations?
The Insider Trading Angle
The sequence of events involving the Pelosi's and Palo Alto Networks smells of insider trading. Yet, as always, there’s plausible deniability.
Nancy Pelosi’s defenders argue that Paul Pelosi’s investments are independent of her legislative role, but critics see this as a convenient shield.
Luigi Mangione’s potential involvement in the cyberattack and subsequent events adds another layer of intrigue.
The Pattern of Power
Let’s not forget that this isn’t the first time Pelosi’s name has been linked to ethically questionable dealings.
From stock market timing to her legislative influence on industries where her family has investments, the Pelosi machine has always operated at the edge of what’s legal and ethical.
Add Luigi Mangione to the mix—a tech-savvy grandson of a family connected to the D’Alesandros—and you have all the ingredients for a scandal that could rival any Washington thriller.
Questions That Demand Answers
If there’s nothing to hide, why did UnitedHealth's CEO end up dead before his DOJ testimony?
Why did Paul Pelosi make a $4 million bet on the very cybersecurity firm that ended up investigating the attack?
Is this a case of random coincidence, or are we witnessing the makings of one of the most explosive political and financial conspiracies in modern history?
Only time will tell, but one thing is clear: when it comes to the Pelosi dynasty, there’s always more to the story.
https://x.com/uncledoomer/status/1866497861799792815?t=IlpNPu0lBqHIroo0MBzh5g&s=19
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1866561871446180239?t=0HzdIW4lyUfZ07sfbOydxA&s=19
https://x.com/realchasegeiser/status/1866508585217257972?t=-2koOLphmX7USrrFPOcY0Q&s=19
[link] [comments]
